#1
|
|||
|
|||
Image file for archival backup
Hi there....
I've backed up a hard drive to a network drive using a sparsebundle, this is for archival purposes, so it won't need to be added to. Would I have been better off with a read-only image? I've read of issues with sparsebundles corrupting, and the big one I've made takes an age to mount and navigate..... Where is all the extra space required during processing a read-only image supposed to be - on source or destination? The destination has heaps of space, but the source (a full hard drive) hasn't. I've used disc images up to about 30GB before - any probs going to 300-400GB or so? Cheers |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SD not unmounting sparse image volumes | acronce | General | 1 | 09-14-2008 11:22 AM |
Backup failure on a certain file | bmat | General | 3 | 09-25-2007 09:06 AM |
Undersized disk image and a Boot Camp-related backup question | garybollocks | General | 3 | 10-23-2006 01:07 PM |
SuperDuper Backup of AES 128 Encrypted Disk Image | rwg4 | General | 3 | 11-30-2005 10:28 AM |
Sparse image from aborted DMG backup? | Winston | General | 9 | 10-22-2005 12:28 PM |