#15
|
|||
|
|||
With a freshly reformatted disk, a clone followed by a smart update yielded 0 files copied and I don't see any anomalies w.r.t. ownership/permissions. Now I'll try moving the clone to my MBP and see if TM can handle it.
... Great. Looks OK this time around. Hopefully, my TM won't get hosed by the upgrade to 10.5.2 ... but at least it looks like SD is doing it's job correctly. Thanks lots Dave! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SuperDuper and Leopard if not using Time Machine | edesignuk | General | 3 | 02-03-2008 06:41 AM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
How will SuperDuper! integrate with Time Machine? | Felix | General | 15 | 10-23-2007 03:55 PM |
Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper | MMM | General | 5 | 07-05-2007 05:20 PM |