 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think of this change? | |||
| Works fine, a big improvement |
   
|
6 | 75.00% |
| Doesn't impress me one way or another |
  
|
2 | 25.00% |
| A step back - what were you thinking? |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#17
05-08-2006, 09:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
There's really no huge downside, since the system takes care of mounting them uniquely. The problem is it's going to be difficult to tell the two drives apart at script time.
The thing about naming the drives the same is that it's not important until you try to boot from the drive. So, you don't have to name it the same until you try to boot from it...
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Threaded Mode