#2
|
||||
|
||||
It's not typical that TM would be faster, but perhaps your LinkStation NAS (which is generally pretty slow) doesn't handle large files (the image) well? Time Machine uses "sparse bundles", which manage a large number of small file "bands" in a package, rather than a "sparse image", which uses a single large file...
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
Tags |
slow, superduper, time machine, timemachine |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Super Slow Time Machine After SuperDuper Restore | kipshaw | General | 5 | 07-12-2009 02:45 PM |
Using SuperDuper for an offsite Time Machine backup | toy | General | 1 | 07-26-2008 12:02 PM |
SuperDuper causing Time Machine to fail | jrdub | General | 2 | 02-26-2008 10:22 PM |
Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? | adriansmith | General | 18 | 02-20-2008 03:48 PM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |