#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the quick reply.
I think of SD! with my weekly (rotating for a month) full system cloning as my "backup" in terms of recovering from things like disk failure, system updates that went wonky, etc. I then think of Time Machine as serving two purposes:
(And then I have a cloud backup for "house burns down") What do you suggest for archiving purposes if it isn't TM? And, if TM isn't for the purpose, what role do you feel TM plays in a backup strategy where SD! is used regularly? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SuperDuper not mounting disk images; copying to root volume | diamondsw | General | 3 | 03-29-2010 02:07 PM |
Problem copying time machine backup | rich | General | 11 | 02-27-2009 01:55 PM |
Cloning my Time Machine HD before repairing it | Ward | General | 1 | 12-06-2008 08:07 AM |
Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? | adriansmith | General | 18 | 02-20-2008 03:48 PM |
A SuperDuper Back Up Strategy | Bagelturf | General | 3 | 09-09-2007 01:23 PM |