#14
|
|||
|
|||
David,
Thanks for your efforts and persistence with SuperDuper 2.5/Leopard. I of course jumped on it as soon as i could. I am trying to do a side by side bootable backup on a Time Machine volume. As you suggest in the forums, i choose to Backup All files using Smart Update from my boot volume (MacOSX) to my Time Machine Volume (BookBak). However when i get to the what is going to happen screen: It does not indicate its going to preserve the Time Machine files/folders as you indicate in your post (and in that thread) on the forums. So i am reluctant to l hit "Copy Now" Should the what will happen now screen say something about preserving Time Machine?? Here are the screen shots: The Destination Volume looks like this: (you can see Backups.backupdb) Here are the options that i choose in SuperDuper (2.5 (v84)) And here is what the Whats going to happen screen looks like Notice no mention of the Time Machine going to be preserved. On the forum, one of the users had mentioned that i should be seeing: "I think dnanian is referring to the paragraph above that in the GUI where it says: "The Time Machine backups on TimeMachineData will be preserved." TimeMachineData being the name of my TM disk." and i dont see it as you can see in the screen shot above. please help! cheers, bammi AT memento-inc DOT com ________ uhwh Last edited by bammi; 01-20-2011 at 08:46 PM. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 10:00 AM |
SuperDuper and Leopard if not using Time Machine | edesignuk | General | 3 | 02-03-2008 06:41 AM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
How will SuperDuper! integrate with Time Machine? | Felix | General | 15 | 10-23-2007 03:55 PM |