#16
|
|||
|
|||
So then isn't my description correct? As it currently works, files would be deleted from destination A and only exist in source B. If they are unreadable/corrupt in source B, the only good copy of the file would have been lost when you pruned destination A. Isn't that the exact same danger you cited?
I know I'm oversimplifying things. I appreciate how difficult proper backup is and that you're taking the time to make sure it works as well as it should. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SuperDuper in Lion opens on restart | dbates | General | 2 | 04-09-2012 06:30 PM |
From Leopard to Snow Leopard; is SuperDuper gonna work? | kirakeerah | General | 2 | 09-02-2009 07:59 PM |
[BUG] SuperDuper does not work on Bootable CD | MicroSlob | General | 3 | 04-15-2006 11:05 AM |
Does SuperDuper have to be running for scheduling to work? | chabig | General | 3 | 12-02-2005 07:19 PM |
will SuperDuper work for my requirements? | jchou | General | 1 | 03-05-2005 04:48 PM |