|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting, but when I try to do
diskutil rename "daily backup" "daily backup2" I get "Failed to rename volume: Read-only file system (49182)". If I do it as Superuser, I am still denied. Maybe using diskutil as su I can at least change permissions? Last edited by Dan Lester; 06-19-2023 at 01:28 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
What's curious is that we do this just after we make the replication (since replication copies the name as well). Not sure why it's locked down after a while...but obviously annoying.
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Especially strange, because I give the name to my backup disk. SuperDuper doesn't. That is, the name of the disk is NOT part of the backup. So by renaming the backup disk, you really aren't modifying the backup on it. So it doesn't seem sensible that the disk name should be protected.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Right, but if you do a replication ("Erase, then copy"), the name comes with it, and we have to set it back to what you called it.
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
no more bootable backups??? | Dan Lester | General | 7 | 11-08-2021 05:33 PM |
encryption and bootable backups? | Dan Lester | General | 10 | 01-06-2014 04:02 PM |
Bootable backups for 2 different Mac computers on one external hard drive? | howlinhill | General | 11 | 01-14-2009 08:49 AM |
SD and TM backups - what goes first? | Moses3d | General | 14 | 02-19-2008 01:53 PM |
Bootable vs file backups, VMware and partitions | dezinnia | General | 19 | 10-25-2007 09:00 AM |