#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
(Of course, the corrupted data files are still corrupted after they are copied.) Quote:
Maybe it's more clear if I say the "drive data" is flawless, but the good drive contains "corrupted data files". Or, even more precisely, there are good files which contain corrupted data. Now that that's clear, to confuse things a little- remember the history is the bad Maxtor was indeed a thoroughly-corrupted drive (bad catalog, bad data, piece of garbage, spawn of satan drive), but we are now dealing with the good drive that has the copy of the Maxtor's contents. Here's what's going on: evil, bad, corrupted Maxtor => good drive Now trying to use SuperDuper! to copy (SuperDuper fails, Finder works!): good drive (with bad Maxtor data) => another drive Hope this helps... ________ Silver Surfer Vaporizer Last edited by stevea; 03-10-2011 at 11:50 AM. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Data integrity question- how much verification by SuperDuper? | stevea | General | 17 | 05-22-2005 11:42 AM |
I've told SuperDuper! to ignore a folder, but it still displays during copying. Why? | dnanian | Frequently Asked Questions | 0 | 12-24-2004 02:36 PM |
Security of SuperDuper Backup Data? | Zeigh | General | 1 | 08-08-2004 12:29 PM |
SuperDuper Problems | LParrish | General | 3 | 06-28-2004 01:25 AM |
Another review: MaMUGs looks at SuperDuper! | dnanian | General | 0 | 01-26-2004 09:26 AM |