![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This may be old news but I've been combing threads and finding nothing. I'm looking for the ultimate backup solution: Using Super Duper! + Time Machine seems sensible but very space consuming (esp for HD video user like myself). Is there anyone out there who uses SD to generate a bootable copy of system files only, while using TM to archive data files, as a way of minimizing use of disk space? Could one then boot-up from SD and restore the rest of the data using TM? Anyone?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
You could certainly exclude certain folders from your SD backup (e.g. your "Movies" folder, or whatever you're considering "Data") and manage that with Time Machine -- but it is nice to have the extra redundancy of both SD! and TM for the information: disk space is cheap, after all, at $200 for a 2TB drive...
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
![]() |
Tags |
disk, space, super duper, time machine |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why each backup requires so much space? | zickzhou | General | 13 | 06-26-2009 03:49 PM |
How much extra space needed for backup? | kathykate | General | 2 | 10-13-2008 03:16 PM |
Hard drive size doubled after backup.... | sanketr | General | 7 | 08-02-2008 12:16 PM |
New to Mac and to SuperDuper - Need a little help | MikeG | General | 15 | 02-14-2008 10:35 PM |
Server drive won't mount after backup | rhennosy | General | 1 | 11-09-2007 03:49 PM |