#1
|
|||
|
|||
I like Super Duper better than time machine
I upgraded to Leopard on 3 macs last night. Been fooling with Time Machine today. It's nice with slick interface, BUT I do not have the feeling that I would want to do a full restore from a catastrophic failure with it.
I definitely agree it has it's place for finding files you figured out you lost or deleted. But NOT a replacement solution for restoring from a catastrophic failure. I know SD is not "fully compatible" with Leopard yet. But, is it "safe" to just do a plain old erase and full backup to my external firewire now...or should I not do an SD backup at all until the Leopard compatible version is out. I'm not using any sandboxes or anything fancy or complicated. Just a basic 500Gb external drive. I guess what I'm asking is would SD not be able to do a restore if I needed to under Leopard? Last edited by djlynch; 10-27-2007 at 09:08 PM. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 10:00 AM |
A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
Initial Super Duper! Settings | greengrass | General | 1 | 08-14-2006 10:40 PM |
Super Duper! saved my data | chris7777 | General | 1 | 12-24-2005 10:45 PM |
Super Duper problem, won't erase target drive | maxwell_photo | General | 3 | 11-24-2005 09:34 AM |