 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-05-2007, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper
When OS X 10.5 (Leopard) comes out in October it will have a file backup feature by default (Time Machine). Are we going to need SuperDuper for anything when that happens?
Also, we are planning on buying a new Mac when Leopard comes out. Our old Mac has already been sold (they are a family member) and they don't plan to upgrade to Leopard. Since it appears that we won't have a need for SuperDuper anymore, is there a way that we can transfer our copy to them, or will it have to go wasted? Thanks 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Future of SuperDuper? (in light of Leopard Time Machine) | backerupper3160 | General | 10 | 10-20-2007 11:18 PM |
| A SuperDuper Back Up Strategy | Bagelturf | General | 3 | 09-09-2007 02:23 PM |
| Why is SuperDuper not running at scheduled time? | Chris_Porter | General | 18 | 07-15-2007 04:33 AM |
| Time Machine | fdwlaw | General | 7 | 08-28-2006 01:44 PM |
| write problems after cloning machine | mkrueger | General | 13 | 12-31-2004 08:17 PM |
Threaded Mode