 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-22-2016, 06:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Defragment
I have cloned the drive and restored back after cancellation but it seems to me that nothing has changed in terms of speed. Is Superduper actually using the same cylinders / areas when restoring or on an empty drive behavior should be different?
Best Regards Pasha 
|
| Tags |
| defragment |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cloning to defragment and Time Machine | D60Dave | General | 4 | 03-03-2010 10:18 AM |
| Does Erase-then-Copy defragment as it transfers? | mtreder88 | General | 1 | 05-05-2008 01:12 PM |
Threaded Mode