Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2009, 11:43 AM
rich rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
Problem copying time machine backup

I'm trying to copy my time machine backup from an old external drive to a new one.

The old drive has some kind of low level file system corruption that fsck can't fix which means it can only be mounted read only. Apart from being read only everything else seems fine. All the data is there and readable. I've tried doing a block level copy using disk utility but that's not working because it also copies the corruption. File level copies work but break when they hit time machine's folder hard links. That's what lead me to SuperDuper which seems to do a file level copy but still support folder hard links.

Here's my problem. My new disk is formatted as Journaled HFS+. When I run "Backup all files, erase then copy" the first thing SuperDuper does is reformat the drive as HFS+ without the journaling. It then spends 3 hours happily copying files across before it hits the first folder hard link and dies with the message:

"Error | SDCopy: Attempt to create hard link on /Volumes/Vault but file system format does not support hard links. Please enable HFS+ Journaling with Disk Utility and try again."

I've tried this a couple of times now to confirm that SuperDuper really is disabling the journaling itself. The last time I even used Disk Utility to turn journaling back on shortly after SuperDuper started copying files. That seemed to work but SuperDuper still dies with the same error message even though journaling *is* enabled. I guess SuperDuper is caching the journaling status not expecting someone to change it mid-backup.

So what can I do to convince SuperDuper to proceed? Can I force it to turn journaling on when it reformats the drive? Can I get it to do the backup without reformatting the drive at all?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2009, 12:27 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
You'll want to use "Smart Update", which won't format the destination, and thus will retain the original format (rather than updating it to match the source's format).
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2009, 12:45 PM
rich rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
It seems Smart Update is only available to registered users. I've absolutely no problem with paying for the software if it works. But I was hoping to get at least one successful backup done to test the software before paying.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-26-2009, 12:45 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Well, turn on journaling for the source, then. You should be able to using Disk Utility.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2009, 12:59 PM
rich rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
Well, turn on journaling for the source, then. You should be able to using Disk Utility.
Nope. The source is read only which is preventing it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2009, 01:27 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Well, as soon as SD! finishes erasing the destination, you can quickly turn Journaling on. That should work.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-26-2009, 01:47 PM
rich rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
Well, as soon as SD! finishes erasing the destination, you can quickly turn Journaling on. That should work.
Sorry. I've already tried that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rich View Post
The last time I even used Disk Utility to turn journaling back on shortly after SuperDuper started copying files. That seemed to work but SuperDuper still dies with the same error message even though journaling *is* enabled. I guess SuperDuper is caching the journaling status not expecting someone to change it mid-backup.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-26-2009, 02:21 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Sorry, missed that. I'm not sure what else to suggest here, rich. If the volume is, in the end, damaged, it's unlikely we'll be able to copy it even if you get journaling on.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-27-2009, 12:24 PM
rich rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
I ended up buying SuperDuper and using Smart Update which worked perfectly.

It's very frustrating when a long running task, such a backup, fails after several hours. So I would like to suggest an improvement to prevent other customers from being bitten by this type of failure. When SuperDuper is copying a time machine archive it should check that the destination volume will be HFS+ journalled at the start of the copy and if it is not then either:

1) Fail early. So that the failure takes seconds not hours
2) Enable journalling on the destination volume. This could be automatic, a preference setting, or after a prompt.

Another thing that would have helped is if SuperDuper recognised that I had manually enabled journalling via Disk Utility part way through the backup. Rather than insisting that journalling was off when it was actually on.

Anyway, just some ideas.

Thanks,

- Richard
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-27-2009, 12:26 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
We actually don't know Journaling will be required until we get to a hard linked folder, which requires Journaling to be on to do... that's why we can't warn you ahead of time.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-27-2009, 01:15 PM
rich rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
We actually don't know Journaling will be required until we get to a hard linked folder, which requires Journaling to be on to do... that's why we can't warn you ahead of time.
It's my understanding that hard linked folders will only ever exist inside a time machine backup. Certainly there is no way I can see for a user to create folder hard links* via the finder or terminal. Also, any time machine backup with more than one snapshot in it will almost certainly contain folder hard links. So it seems to me that checking for the existence of a time machine backup is almost exactly equivalent to checking for folder hard links.

Alternatively, If you don't like the idea of checking up front maybe SuperDuper could try to turn journalling on when it hits a hard linked folder instead of just throwing an error.

* Which makes we wonder how SuperDuper does it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-27-2009, 01:55 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
It was something we considered doing, but since Smart Update can resume the update relatively quickly it didn't have sufficient upside to justify the logic involved, but it's still on the list of potentials.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error 18 in Time Machine.... iith096 General 4 10-20-2008 03:57 PM
Using SuperDuper for an offsite Time Machine backup toy General 1 07-26-2008 12:02 PM
Cloning from a backup and Time Machine Weirdness isaac General 3 03-27-2008 01:09 PM
Time Machine to an existing SD backup volume? scutchen General 1 02-22-2008 02:26 PM
How do I store a bootable backup side-by-side with my Time Machine data? dnanian Frequently Asked Questions 0 02-07-2008 06:36 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.