 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
08-27-2008, 05:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Because rsync -aE isn't actually preserving everything in the file, in most cases. I think you'll also find that subsequent Smart Updates with SuperDuper! are significantly faster.
I haven't found that rsync vs. SD!, in overall speed once done (time elapsed), is that different -- it's possible, too, that the measurements are not entirely comparable.
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Tags |
| performance, slow, speed |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Windows equivalent to SuperDuper!? | jreffner | General | 21 | 08-13-2009 06:36 PM |
| Backup a currently existing MBP drive to a fresh drive with SD? | montag | General | 4 | 05-22-2008 03:03 PM |
| Backing up an external drive to an external drive | Nik001 | General | 3 | 10-27-2007 12:25 PM |
| How to verify a Scheduled Backup? | tuqqer | General | 3 | 12-06-2005 07:50 PM |
| automatic initiation of backup when I plugin/mount my external Firefox drive? | mykmelez | General | 3 | 07-11-2005 04:00 PM |
Threaded Mode